The Case Against The Case Against Women In Combat

On the 24th of January the Department of Defense announced that it would do away with the 1994 Direct Ground Combat Definition and Assignment Rule for women and open up more combat and combat support Military Occupational Specialties (MOS) to female service members.  This announcement has been hailed as a coup for equal rights activists, but it is an even bigger victory for women who have been facing combat in the asymmetrical battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan despite this archaic rule and for those seeking advancement in a military hierarchy that reserves its highest echelons for troops who have served honorably in combat related positions from which women were explicitly excluded.  Furthermore, the removal of the barriers put in place by this rule will widen the pool of candidates from which unit level commanders can draw to fill combat positions, thus relieving some of the stress that has been felt by the thinly stretched corps of young officers and non-commissioned officers over the last decade as they have been pressed into multiple tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Of course this development has not been met with enthusiasm from all corners of the military.  One of the most outspoken opponents of lifting these barriers is LTG (Ret.) Jerry Boykin.  General Boykin is a US Army veteran, former member of the Special Operations and intelligence communities, and current Executive Vice President of the Family Research Council.  As a fellow veteran, I respect General Boykin and appreciate all that he has done in the service of his country.  But this soldier cum evangelical preacher is stuck in the backwards logic of an era when women were best confined to overseeing matters of the home.  His views on the matter are not only a disservice to the women who have been bravely facing combat for years now, but also to the US military’s ability to prepare all of its members for the rigors of defending the nation.

For a recap and assessment of General Boykin’s thoughts on the matter I recommend the piece written by William Saletan over at Slate.  It suffices to say that General Boykin thinks very little of a woman’s ability to go without certain amenities of personal hygiene for extended periods, or of a man’s ability to serve side-by-side with a women without being embarrassed about having to do so.  This is to say nothing of the General’s lack of confidence in the military’s ability to uphold the standards of combat readiness or his seeming lack of understanding that women have already been serving on the front lines for over a decade in Iraq and Afghanistan where the front line is everywhere.

I posted my full thoughts on the DOD’s decision earlier in the week, and I won’t rehash it here.  I will simply close be reiterating the fact that equal treatment and opportunity are rights that supposedly important in American society.  Upholding them in this case does not require a lowering of standards, a lessening of combat readiness, or institutional detriment in the name of social experimentation.  It will however require a change in the culture of military leadership that sees clearly delineated roles between the sexes instead of taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of the individual soldier and their ability to accomplish the mission.  Not every female trooper will meet the standards required of an Infantry officer or a Fire Support Specialist, but those that can will be an asset to the nation and its military.


About Sean D. Hillyer

Sean Hillyer hails from the Buckeye State and loves all things Ohio. He is a US Army veteran of Kosovo and Iraq, a student of Political Science, and a wannabe homebrewer. In addition to "Schweinfurt Expats," "wtf, Cobra?" and his prodigious Twitter output, he is also a contributing author for Social Democrats, USA. Sean currently lives in Schweinfurt, Germany. View all posts by Sean D. Hillyer

2 responses to “The Case Against The Case Against Women In Combat

  • redchief001

    Having served as a team/squad leader in both Iraq and Afghanistan I could not agree more with the logic behind the changes that are taking place in regard to combat arms MOS’s. In both theaters my soldiers and I were routinely pushed to remote locations under less than ideal conditions and the females in my unit did what was expected of any other soldier at the time.

    I think that, based on the slate article your hyper-linked, one of the problems that leads to the unwillingness of those like Gen. Boykin to accept this reform stems from the misconception/assumption, that standards would have to change in order to allow women to actually serve in combat MOS’s. I, like you, do not know where he would get the inkling that lower standards would naturally accompany changes of this type or why he and others of similar mind believe that leadership at the highest levels would allow said standard lowering to occur.

    Changes in standards in both directions in order to accommodate changes in necessary readiness/retention and political climate have been taking place in the military for quite some time. I am of the opinion that the discontent surrounding allowing women to fill traditionally blocked combat roles is simply a symptom of a larger problem that Gen. Boykin and others who take issue with women in combat would be better off focusing their energies on. Is there not simply a fear that the standards are already so low that women could find themselves in combat arms MOS’s just as woefully unqualified as some of their male comrades? Having been in more than my fair share of life threatening situations, I can say that not every male can deal with the stressors involved in armed conflict, physical and mental.

Please share your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Tacos and Dinosaurs

Pop Culture, Humor, and Random Awesomeness by Eric Malcolm

Dawg Pound Nation

Zero BS Cleveland Browns Blog.

USAG Bamberg


The German Way & More

A Voice Made Of Snark And Slander

Oh God, My Wife Is German.

The Misadventures of an American Expat and His Wife in Germany


Rotation Curation for Germany

Break the Broken

Guilty pleasures broken down...

Socialist Currents

Socialist Currents is a publication of Social Democrats USA

Toward a Radical Center

For a Politics of neither the Left nor the Right

Mightier Than The Pen

Making The World A Bitter Place

Socialist Currents

A Voice Made Of Snark And Slander

Closure 2014 Blog

Answering all your Closure 2014 questions

Diary of a Fat Girl

A Voice Made Of Snark And Slander

Just another WordPress weblog

Alex von Halem

A Voice Made Of Snark And Slander


A Voice Made Of Snark And Slander

%d bloggers like this: